> Spad code adds type declarations while Lisp NCONC needs > to perform some runtime type checking, so Spad > version should be more efficient (I do not know if > it is, acutal efficiency depends on quality of Spad > and Lisp compilers).
Wow, Spad can be faster than lisp? That's new to me. I'll leave it to you to make the changes and commit them. (code and documentation) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
