> "I would not expect anything
> reasonable for y after applying a destructive operation to x."
That's right, but do you consider 'queue x' ('construct(x)$Queue INT')
destructive?
> an implementation of Stack that copies its constructor argument
> and another implementation that does not.
See my other thread "2 issues about aggcat.spad",
I think both construct and parts in FriCAS *are required* to copy
its argument, otherwise will be a bug.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
