> Implement in category means you have to use abstracted > constructor and selector (degree P vs. P.first.k), but I think > that doesn't slow down the algorithm much. > (On the other hand, I think there is only one Rep for > polynomials in FriCAS essentially, and only domain > essentially (SUP), so implement in SUP or UPOLYC > doesn't make much difference for now?)
I thought, we also have a dense form of univariate polynomials. But even if we don't have it, someone might implement it in the future. If then the implementation of pseudoDivide comes from the category default, I bet on a representation of dense univariate polynomials, it's inefficient. That would be the reason to opt for an implementation in SUP or in a package and have SUP call that package. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
