oldk1331 wrote:
> Use Functor category to abstract the 'map' function,
> to reduce the number of ')display op map', what do
> you think?

We have more than 50 packages named '*Functions2' which
implement 'map' between two domains.  In principle
they could use single signature from single category.  However:

- Functor is quite loaded name and may lead to confusion.
  Something like 'MapCategory2' seem to fit better existing
  naming scheme.
- What documentatin do you propose for the 'map' function?
  Current scheme with several signatures has a separate
  documentation slot per signature.  Common signature would
  be quite abstract, so hard to specify.

                              Waldek Hebisch

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to