oldk1331 wrote: > > Use Functor category to abstract the 'map' function, > to reduce the number of ')display op map', what do > you think?
We have more than 50 packages named '*Functions2' which implement 'map' between two domains. In principle they could use single signature from single category. However: - Functor is quite loaded name and may lead to confusion. Something like 'MapCategory2' seem to fit better existing naming scheme. - What documentatin do you propose for the 'map' function? Current scheme with several signatures has a separate documentation slot per signature. Common signature would be quite abstract, so hard to specify. -- Waldek Hebisch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.