oldk1331 wrote:
>
> Use Functor category to abstract the 'map' function,
> to reduce the number of ')display op map', what do
> you think?
We have more than 50 packages named '*Functions2' which
implement 'map' between two domains. In principle
they could use single signature from single category. However:
- Functor is quite loaded name and may lead to confusion.
Something like 'MapCategory2' seem to fit better existing
naming scheme.
- What documentatin do you propose for the 'map' function?
Current scheme with several signatures has a separate
documentation slot per signature. Common signature would
be quite abstract, so hard to specify.
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
