I think there is a potential in the 'latex' routines to produce a more "semantic" style of LaTeX output. See for example:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216797904_Using_LaTeX_as_a_Semantic_Markup_Format and some discussion on this issue on the axiom-developer list http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=semantic&submit=Search%21&idxname=axiom-developer&max=20&result=normal&sort=score I like the idea of integrating these two ways of generating LaTeX output. On 12 January 2017 at 07:47, Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm not very familiar with TexFormat, but it seems that >> TexFormat works with OutputForm, so there's definitely >> loss of information between domain D and (D::OutputForm), >> so there are domains that "latex" will produce more >> information than TexFormat, right? > > OutputForm is supposed to contain what is needed for > formatting. If there is something missing, it should > be added. > > -- > Waldek Hebisch > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
