Bill, I pulled the latest version of sexpr.spad today and now get an error I have no explanation for (I created a unit test file using the input from the sandbox).
Four of the seven errors (see tail of sexpr.output) are not errors as such, only caused by the ordering. case ex2:20 and 21 might be caused by the Unittest itself, though I'm not sure. case ex4:4 is strange: the rule application "rc t2" does not work anymore and building "expr" take 30s, and even worse "rc rs expr" takes almost 100s (result is wrong due to failing of "rc"). I had a look at the diff on github but got no clue where it might come from. You will certainly find it in no time. Kurt Am 05.02.2017 um 05:05 schrieb Bill Page: > The reason that i wrote this as _rule is because the interpreter seems > to have a bug that coerces things to Expression Integer. Using the > function call syntax seems to get around that and I also use a package > call in order to be very specific if necessary. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
sexpr.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
