oldk1331 wrote:
>
> > so ')compile'
> > invalidates them all. Smarter ')compile' could
> > track dependencies and try to invalidate only
> > minimal set of constructors, but this is tricky
> > to implements.
>
> Can you point out where does "invalidates
> all kernel caches" happen?
> (So that I can disable it when I'm sure it's safe.)
Directly this is done by 'clearConstructorCache'. Without
'clearConstructorCache' if you load new version of constructor
you will get strange mix of old and new routines. So
during developement skipping 'clearConstructorCache' is
essentially never safe.
> BTW, does this affect your development loop?
> I mean, after compiling a file, you have to
> re-eval all variables?
Well, expressions. For short seqences of commands I recall
them from command history. Longer ones I put in files.
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
