On 05/23/2017 05:14 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > So it is probably better to have a separate function, say > 'fractionGcd'.
If at all, I'd be in favour of such a new function fractionGcd. However, my question is whether it is really worth implementing a new function. Yes, it's convenient, but any user can define fractionGcd(x,y) := gcd(numer x, numer y) / lcm(denom x, denom y) as a simple oneliner if he/she really needs such a function. How useful is this function for the general Fraction constructor if in an instance Fraction(S) the S is something like PrimeField 7? Has anyone a good use case for such a fractionGcd function other than just convenience? Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
