Dear Waldek, 

thanks for your explanation on FriCAS long term goals. Below a few, mild 

> In general
> you need to figure out what package manager given disto uses and what
> flavour of packages it needs.  That already two extra steps compared to
> using a tarball (OK, using a tarball you need to know if you run 32
> bit distro or 64 bit one and you are out of luck if the machine is
> not PC-compatible, but still simpler).

Mmm... you are skipping  "...with a guarantee of future automatic upgrades.":
I do "apt-get install" once, then I "apt-get dist-upgrade" (or apt-get 
safe-upgrade") and all the software in my machine is up to date with no 
effort.... what is simpler for a lazy|busy user?

>_You_ may voice request at distribution to include FriCAS. 

OK, could be better written, but done:

I guess that FriCAS users interested in having binaries  distributed by debian, 
if any around, should support my request for a new package fricas (reportbug, 
package: wnpp, bug: 890525), otherwise it will have zero measure...

> Does it matter much what is official?

Right, bad wording: replace "official" by "reliable".

> That is a wiki: by definition it is unstructured and disorganised.

Just for nut-picking's love: "Unstructured by definition" OK, but 
"disorganized" is not necessary the case if the goal of the wiki is to transmit 
information to users. I do not know the current software, but in eg Mediawiki 
you may organize articles in a graph of categories just by adding simple tags 
like [[SPAD]], [[Install]], [[Integration]], [[History]], [[Beginners]] and 
have the category page automatically generated. Overview or starting point 
pages describing stable content may be manually added  for tree-like reading.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
For more options, visit

Reply via email to