On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:18 PM, Ralf Hemmecke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Clearly, that is a partial function. But I think it makes sense to also
> expose useful partial functions without putting the result in
> Union(Integer, "failed").
> Isn't it a waste to put an integer into a union, if the first thing a
> user does is to simply take out the integer from the union structure?
>
> Ralf

It would be a waste if it's used heavily inside a loop and noticeable
by profiler.  Like the 'subtractIfCan' case we discussed earlier.
I'm not sure about 'exquo'.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to