Riccardo GUIDA wrote:
>
> > This is old confusion between real and complex. We create
> > Complex(Complex(Integer)) and loose.
>
> Naive question: is it not possible/enough to define Complex(R) to be R if R =
> Complex (S)?
No. There are axioms which link 'real', 'imag' and 'complex' that
essentially force current implementation. Trying to cheat
(ignering axioms) is likely to lead to problems in other places.
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
