On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 9:51:44 PM UTC+2, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
>
> Foad S Farimani wrote: 
> > 
> > While ago I was trying to use polynomial power series to solve a system 
> of 
> > partial differential and algebraic equations, when realized there is no 
> > implementation of the idea. There is only Mathematica's 
> > AsymptoticDSolveValue which is just for ODEs. 
>
> Well, FriCAS has 'seriesSolve'.  For ODEs it should work 
> directly. 

This awesome.  Could you be so kind to pint me to the source code? I want 
to learn the algorithm.

>  For PDE you would need some preprocessing. 
>
If you have any ideas for the algorithm please share over here 
<https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/95886/algorithm-for-using-power-series-to-numerically-solve-a-partial-differential-equ>
 

>
> > So I decided to implement it 
> > myself. Thanks to the Sympy community we now have some progress. I have 
> one 
> > implementation over here 
> > <
> http://nbviewer.jupyter.org/gist/celliern/b38158d04d9dc3d8079dc44e3b747ac8> 
>
> >  by Nicolas CELLIER <https://github.com/celliern> and some ideas over 
> here 
> > <
> https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/95886/algorithm-for-using-power-series-to-numerically-solve-a-partial-differential-equ>
>  
>
> > by me and some of SymPy developers. I was wondering if we could join 
> forces 
> > to come of with a general algorithm, then implementionation on diffrent 
> > languages shouldn't be that difficult. I was wondering if you could take 
> a 
> > look at this question 
> > <
> https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/95886/algorithm-for-using-power-series-to-numerically-solve-a-partial-differential-equ>
>  
>
> > and help us out. 
>
> Well, what you write look strange.

disclaimer, I collected most of the pices from other places, so I'm barely 
the developer. Would you be so kind to let me know which part doesn't make 
sense? 

>  Normally, truncated series 
> will be only approximation to true solution so it will _not_ 
> satisfy boundary conditions.

I'm not sure if I understand your point completely, but I mentioned some 
solutions to the boundary condition incompatibility over here second comment 
<https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/15015#>. I think  integral of the 
square of the error could be used to minimize the error.

>  IOW, solving in say R^n\times R 
> you want initial data, but no boundary conditions.

I don not understand this, would you please elaborate? 

>  If 
> your equation is appropriate, then Cauchy-Kovalevskaya theorem 
> says that for given initial data you will get unique power series 
> solution in neighbourhood of initial point. 


This was also mentioned here in the Sympy mailing list 
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sympy/X3h38SqQBCo>. I'm going to 
learn more about this.
 

>  After little 
> preprocessing FriCAS 'seriesSolve' should give you this 
> solution. 
>
Looking forwards to that.  

>
> If assumptions of Cauchy-Kovalevskaya theorem are not satisfied, 
> then it is possible that some transformation will give you 
> new system for which Cauchy-Kovalevskaya method works. 
> FriCAS Jet bundle package can help here. 
>
No idea what is this. is there a good link I can read more about it? 

>
> -- 
>                               Waldek Hebisch 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to