> This tells you that offending part is
> 
>         a < b
> 
>> ****** level 3  ******
>> $x:= (< a b)
>> $m:= (Boolean)
>> $f:=
>> ((((|b| # #) (|a| # #) (|foo| #) (|$DomainsInScope| # # #) ...)))
>>
>>    >> Apparent user error:
>>    not known that (List (List (Integer))) has (AND (has (List (List
>> (Integer))) (finiteAggregate)) (has (List (Integer)) (OrderedSet)))
>                                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^

Yes, clearly a<b is the problem in

    foo(): Boolean ==
        a: List List Integer := empty()
        b: List List Integer := empty()
        a < b

So, finding the exact source position of the problem was not the issue.

But why is it a problem?


(4) -> Integer has OrderedSet
true

(5) -> List Integer has OrderedSet
true

(6) -> List List Integer has OrderedSet
true

Furthermore, I find the expression

>>    not known that (List (List (Integer))) has (AND (has (List (List
>> (Integer))) (finiteAggregate)) (has (List (Integer)) (OrderedSet)))

a bit strange. There is an AND part that can either be true or false. As
I understand it, the compiler  tells me that List(List Integer) is not
of the category true or false. Perhaps, I have to interpret the above
"... has (AND (has ...) (has ...))".

> This is compiler's way of saying that it does not have ordering
> predicate for List(List(Integer)).

As you see from the session above, OrderedSet shouldn't be a problem.

> Another thing is wording of error messages.  If you have
> proposals for better wording I would like to hear them.

No the wording was not the problem. But I would have expected a category
in place X when it says: "not know that ... has X".

> And, BTW what you think about interpreter error messages?

Oh, sorry, but I haven't systematically investigated it. You can be sure
that I report back if something bothers me too much, but otherwise I
simply cannot say.

What I care more about currently, are compiler messages that throw a
lisp expression at me. It is managable if I see << ... >> and thus can
locate the error. But sometimes that marker is missing.

Well my dream would be Aldor error messages with the speed of the Spad
compiler. ;-)

Ralf

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/1f64dc57-0450-b19d-3d15-7e3d35d5a424%40hemmecke.org.

Reply via email to