On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 03:36:34AM +0100, Kurt Pagani wrote:
> On 29.02.2020 15:15, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
>
> > The attached diff solves TeX problem in similar but I
> > think slightly better way.
>
> Indeed, perfect (tex_rev2620.pdf). Thanks!
>
> It may also work for TeXmacs,
> > but that I did not test it. In particular I do not know
> > if "<prime>" is the right TeXmacs sequence to get derivative sign.
> >
>
> Unfortunately, TeXmacs doesn't recognize <prime> (tm_rev2620.pdf file).
> I use texmacs only with latex commands, i.e. I do not know many key bindings
> and
> the like. It seems, however, that when entering "\prime" in TM, it doesn't
> work
> either (unless sent via an ESC interface sequence). All I found so far:
>
> http://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/manual/webman-math.en.html
> 3.Main mathematical constructs
> Primes, subscripts and superscripts are created as follows:
> Shortcut Purpose
> ' Primes
> ??? Back-primes
>
> Maybe one could define a macro in TM to define <prime>? I've no clue at the
> moment.
Well, it seems that the patch get rid of string qoutes (that was
regression due to change in OutputForm). So I commited part of
the patch, but without '<prime>' part for Texmacs. If anybody
knows how to send proper derivative sign to Texmacs please say
(or propose a patch). Otherwise Texmacs interface will be back
at older behaviour, not great but IIRC no so bad either.
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/20200302164630.GA4227%40math.uni.wroc.pl.
