On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 05:33:15AM -0700, Roustam Shaitan wrote:
> What I really need is to solve the system for s but solve([%% 6, %% 7],
> [s]) also gave me an empty list. I only added t because in Mathematica
> Reduce[{%7, %8}, {s, t}] gives several solutions one of which contains the
> sought equation for s [but after replacing k with n*m beforehand]. [s,
> exp(-k*t/m)] suggested by you gives the equation (6) solved for exp(-k*t/m)
> which is not what I want.
I see, FriCAS lives dependence on t in implicit form (unsolved).
This dependece can be soved using lambertW, but ATM FriCAS does
not make use of lambertW for solving.
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/20200802135253.GA19797%40math.uni.wroc.pl.
