> Clearly, for replacing Boot code by Spad we need domains > which will preserve values of variables. My current > idea is to have list of "system" domains which do not > reference much outside and for which variables are > preserved (which is how Boot works).
Well, the whole thing is only a problem for advanced users who actually do use )lib and )compile. I understand, that you would like system domains (sounds like "runtime support domains"). Such a distinction I can support, but otherwise I do not like much that there are two different kinds of domains. In fact, when you introduce runtime-support stuff, it would make sense to clean up the library by moving all $Lisp calls out and rather provide a domain/package "RuntimeSupport" with a clear and sufficient API so that nobody has to call any foo$Lisp anymore. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/1c087ba0-2f65-29ea-7c38-3cf0061301e0%40hemmecke.org.
