>> - 3d objects look brighter >> - 3d meshes are thinner > > Hmm, on my machine 3D Postscript output that I see looks very > similar to .xpm and certainly no worse.
Oh, sorry. That should not have gone under the heading "issues". Rather it is "differences". In fact, I like the FriCAS generated 3D graphics more than the .xpm -> .ps conversion done by ImageMagick. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/cbd073e0-bba3-6db6-221b-268f1da9107e%40hemmecke.org.
