> I have an algorithm implemented in both Fricas (Spad) and in C++. The > C++ code turns out to be 13 to 14 times faster than Spad, and a single > call can last arbitrarily many minutes, depending on the parameters. > Thus I would prefer to use the C++ implementation in the rest of my > Fricas Spad code.
I would very much love to see a FriCAS--C/C++ interface, so I don't want to reduce you motivation to produce one in any way. But sorry, I cannot help you. However, although it is, of course, possible that FriCAS performs slower than C++ code, but since you haven't made it public only you can judge whether your SPAD-code is optimally coded. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/7f770219-b586-5774-f6a5-5be9d5fa216d%40hemmecke.org.
