On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 07:34:24AM +0800, Qian Yun wrote: > It is definitely possible to control the inclusion, but that means > adding another global variable. Because it also affects the size of > BoundingBox.
I would not worry to much about global variable. I mean, there are several of them already. And there is call structure passing data between functions. I think that we can move most of global data to function parameters. And we can add new field to corresponding structures, so we can pass all data that is needed. > Since this "title and frame" is not there for the past decades, > I think we can start freshly by choosing "title inside > viewWindow and no frame"? I think that we should try to preserve/expose flexibility that is there. Ideally various options could be used in any combination (of course, so option combinations really do not make sense, but we should exclude only ones that are _really_ nonsense). > On 4/16/24 03:10, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > > > > It is better to present consitent interface. OTOH important use of > > .ps is for inclusion inside text. In such case title and frame > > may be undesirable. So I think we need a way to control inclusion > > of title and frame. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/b7b53ef1-fea2-450a-ad46-8d914fb6bd2d%40gmail.com. -- Waldek Hebisch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/Zh6VXy2ItDarFuPn%40fricas.org.
