Le mer. 29 mai 2024 à 07:20, Ralf Hemmecke <r...@hemmecke.org> a écrit : > > >> unitNormal x == > >> zero? x => [1, x, 1] > >> one? x => [1, 1, 1] > >> re := real(x); im := imag(x) > >> re > 0 => > >> --im >= 0 => [1, x, 1] > >> im > 0 => [1, x, 1] > >> im < 0 => [-imaginary(), complex(-im, re), imaginary()] > >> im <= 0 => [-1, -x, -1] > >> [imaginary(), complex(im, -re), -imaginary()] > > Given that zero? x is checked at the beginning and assuming that zero? x > means "zero?(real(x)) and zero?(imag(x))", how can im=0 happen in the > commented case?
Yes... And it is still not satisfactory, I have to rewrite it. It is not poetry I admit. - Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/CAHnU2dapaa7sS3_7nOpLAf__Cb%2B92FDP5R9GTb%2BJkNgTdg36_A%40mail.gmail.com.
