I'd be very interested in the actual computation.  I suspect that the sage 
implementation is much slower, but I'd be curious to know!

Best wishes,

Martin

On Saturday 27 July 2024 at 17:33:29 UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:

> > AFAICS this is essentially the same problem that we had with
> > multiplication of power series (see doc/sttaylor.txt).
>
> Oh, cool. That is a good piece of explanation. Unfortunately, I haven't 
> seen it before.
>
> And yes, the already used initial part of these streams might get 
> garbage collected, but I guess, it is better, to simply not create them 
> in the first place. Then also the garbage collector has nothing to do.
>
> >> Is there a chance that this could make it into FriCAS?
> > 
> > Yes, this looks reasonable.
>
> Oh, that makes me happy.
>
> > ATM main trouble I see are longish lines and differen code style.
>
> Well, I usually go < 80, but if you prefer <72 that is also fine for me.
> And yes, I like "a: T" much more than "a : T", but if you insist on the 
> latter, then it's also fine for me.
>
> > It makes sense to run a bit more tests, I will do this and come back to
> > this in a day ar two.
>
> OK, I wait with the style modifications until then.
>
> Ralf
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/ebcba8ab-83e0-4a6c-ac04-afefee79dc71n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to