Le lun. 24 nov. 2025 à 08:29, 'Ralf Hemmecke' via FriCAS - computer algebra system <[email protected]> a écrit : > > As far as I can tell, both versions are syntactically correct.
Ok, so I was misled. > I would agree, though, that adding a comma, looks more pleasing. > Maybe the following sessing helps to understand. > > There is an elt function call, if there is no comma. > > https://fricas.github.io/api/StringAggregate.html#l537472696e67416767726567617465-656c74 Totally unaware of this, it's a pity. I concatenate a lot of strings. Thanks a lot! > Ralf > > %%% (1) -> concat ["a", "b" "c"] > > (1) "abc" > Type: String > %%% (2) -> concat ["a", "b", "c"] > > (2) "abc" > Type: String > %%% (3) -> # ["a", "b" "c"] > > (3) 2 > Type: PositiveInteger > %%% (4) -> # ["a", "b", "c"] > > (4) 3 > Type: PositiveInteger > %%% (5) -> ["a", "b" "c"] > > (5) ["a", "bc"] > Type: List(String) > %%% (6) -> ["a", "b", "c"] > > (6) ["a", "b", "c"] > Type: List(String) > %%% (7) -> ["a", "b""c"] > > (7) ["a", "bc"] > Type: List(String) > So I will look deeper into this, particularly the generated Lisp code. Thanks again that's very good to know. Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/CAHnU2db%3Dt6P%2BC9emsXUbF9Wn%2BZeVFYkXEB%3DnJqUNcieA539L%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com.
