About some comments removal, maybe this is kept for historical reasons, but that could also be removed I think:
└─$ grep -r -C 2 GGREATER src/interp/ src/interp/macros.lisp-(DEFUN |lt_sexp| (U V) src/interp/macros.lisp- "Multiple-type ordering relation." src/interp/macros.lisp:;;; Result negated compared to LEXGREATERP and GGREATERP src/interp/macros.lisp-;;; Order of types: nil number symbol string vector cons" src/interp/macros.lisp- (COND ((EQ U V) NIL) -- src/interp/g-util.boot- mergeSort(pred,key,list,LENGTH list) src/interp/g-util.boot- src/interp/g-util.boot:-- non-destructive merge sort using NOT GGREATERP as predicate src/interp/g-util.boot-MSORT list == listSort(function GLESSEQP, COPY_-LIST list) src/interp/g-util.boot- src/interp/g-util.boot:-- destructive merge sort using NOT GGREATERP as predicate src/interp/g-util.boot-NMSORT list == listSort(function GLESSEQP, list) src/interp/g-util.boot- Greg Le mar. 2 juin 2026 à 13:42, Qian Yun <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On 6/2/26 7:06 PM, 'Ralf Hemmecke' via FriCAS - computer algebra system > wrote: > > On 6/2/26 11:31, Qian Yun wrote: > >> If you have question on any of them, feel free to ask. > > > > Is there a reason why you want to suppress the output? > > > > @@ -4532,7 +4532,7 @@ roots of \smath{p(x)} as \spad{i} ranges from > > \spad{1} to \spad{5}. \xtc{ > > Assign the roots as the values of the variables \spad{a1,...,a5}. > > }{ > > -\spadcommand{(a1,a2,a3,a4,a5) := > > (roots.1,roots.2,roots.3,roots.4,roots.5) \free{roots} \bound{ais}} > > +\spadcommand{(a1,a2,a3,a4,a5) := > > (roots.1,roots.2,roots.3,roots.4,roots.5); \free{roots} \bound{ais}} > > } > > It is page 328. First, the 5 roots is listed is previous command. > Second, this is assignment of 5 variables, only the last one > is printed, which is unnecessary. > > > By this you change the output corresponding to the original printed > > version of the book. I haven't yet checked, but I also guess that then > > the numbering of the labels for the following outputs change, i.e. (14) > > then becomes (13). I am not sure currently whether there is proper > > reference to such number (i.e. in a latex-way) or whether they are > > hardcoded in some way, so I would be a bit careful here. > > > > If this is all checked, I agree with removing the output. > > > > Ralf > > > > The numbering is not affected by ";" at end, just checked > in the book with this patch. > > - Qian > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/91a4533a-cbc2-4243-abd9-974e46671c05%40gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/CAHnU2daCaksqSwD1aXnSdZhmvr9kce4UVzGfW0zPNscXUhjgng%40mail.gmail.com.
