Zdravo! > Ko bi le bilo tako enostavno. Mislim, da ne bi bil nihče tiho, ko bi > nekdo poslal vabilo na tabor "Povabilo na tabor White supremacy in > Slovenia 2007/2008". Po mojem bi se vsi zgrožali in pošiljali odgovore.
In odgovori tipa "buu", "bljak", "dol s tem" ali pa mogoce celo "super" tudi ne bi ravno koristili? Samo jaz vseeno ne bi metal to v isti kos. > Sam to tut ne pomeni da moras izkoriscat to. Zakaj bi pa ti bil referenca > za to, katera sporocila so dobra, informativna in katera ne? Nisem tega napisal. Napisal sem, da naj vsak sam pri sebi razmisli, ce je tisto, kar posilja informativno. Jaz le ta kriterij ponujam. Pogledal sem in v letu 2006 sem poslal 8 "politicnih" e-mailov na to listo. Je pa res, da sem letos to ze presegel z 10timi taksnimi e-maili. Ne vem, ce je to res problem. Problem so flamei, ki se potem sprozijo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaming_%28Internet%29 A flame may have elements of a normal message, but is distinguished by its intent. A flame is typically not intended to be constructive, to further clarify a discussion, or to persuade other people. The motive for flaming is often not dialectic, but rather social or psychological. Sometimes, flamers are attempting to assert their authority, or establish a position of superiority. Other times, the flamer is simply a closed-minded or biased individual whose conviction that his is the only valid opinion leads him to personally attack any "dissenters." Mitar
