2010.12.19. 23:29:09-kor Miklos Vajna írta:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 01:24:50PM +0100, Miklos Vajna
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > I take it back. It's smart enough to detect not to fsck virtual disk
> > devices and I was testing this in a virtual machine. ;)
> >
> > I just added it to http://wiki.frugalware.org/index.php/Systemd#TODO and
> > will have a look at it when I can test this on a real machine.
>
> It turns out this was not the reason. systemd has this "socket
> activation" feature - which means systemd creates the socket (for
> example /dev/log for syslog) and it starts the daemon only in case
> someone actually connects to it.
>
> Now systemd expects that syslog already has this feature. So we have two
> choices:
>
> - do massive hacks to let systemd do not expect this
> - add the little backwards-compatible patch to syslog
>
> I choosed the second, and now the output of fsck is logged in
> /var/log/syslog:
>
> # grep fsck /var/log/syslog |tail -n 1
> Dec 19 23:11:16 frugalware kernel: systemd-fsck[1411]: /dev/sda1: clean,
> 68854/524288 files, 377743/2096474 blocks
What about syslog-ng? There must be others out there who prefer that one over
plain old syslog. Will I be able to simply continue using syslog-ng?
--
Bye, Boobaa (CSÉCSY László)
http://csecsy.hu
_______________________________________________
Frugalware-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
