Le Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:06:11 +0100, Miklos Vajna <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi, > > I thought about this because of the ARM port, but the idea is quite old > anyway. > > So the problem is that usually I do everything around releases and in > fact I mostly test i686 only, since that's what I'm currently running on > my production box. > > It would be nice if we could have 'port maintainers', ie somebody who is > known to be a user of a given architecture. Tasks for such a maintainer > would be: > > - fix issues pointed out by the arch-specific part of the testsuite > - provide installer images in the -iso directory when we do a release > - take care of the failed package builds > > In general, of course package maintainers try to take care of all archs > of their packages, but this is not always possible - for example right > now I don't have an ARM board, so at best I can test something in qemu > only, which is not enough. > > A technical part of this is that right now all the frugalware-current > and frugalware-current-iso dirs are owned by me (vmiklos), which is a > no-go if I try to hand over the x86_64/ppc/arm maintainership. > > So the plan would be that after 1.5pre1 I chown the whole tree to a > special user 'repo', and port maintainers would have access to that user > (via sudo). > > Potential candidates I see: > > - x86_64: Daniel? > - ppc: Bouleetbil? (side note: if everything goes well, we'll soon > have a better HW under burns, probably a dual cpu box) Ah great :) > - arm: Elentir? > > To sum up: this is just an RFC at the moment, and I guess nothing will > change for 1.5pre1, but I would like to do this migration after that > release. > > Comments? > > Thanks. Hi, I can take ppc and x86_64 I think daniel now have only i686 bye _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
