On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:02 AM, DarkNekros <darknek...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> This request has been open for more than 5 years without any real >>> action. When I proposed that it be closed within the next 4 weeks I >>> had a response from pete asking if that's the official answer. I >>> replied that it wasn't the official answer and that I would ask for >>> one. >>> >>> Personally I would like to see nano added to the base group. Does anyone >>> object? > > >> Nano would be nice but MC would be even better , that would give you a >> simple gui text editor plus a gui for file handling and other stuff. >> Pretty useful I think. Still if not possible then I'm for including >> nano too. > > > IMHO I think that vi(m) is good for text editing, but I could add > some more as joe, emacs, nano, MC, etc. All of them are simple (well, > perhaps not emacs xD ) and for "simple" text editing could be good. > Nowdaways all text editors have a GUI interface to work with so I > don't think it could be a barrier to not to include them in base. In > the other hand, we want a simple text editor in base, not a > big-monster-text editor (the user can install it later, if needed). > > I hope my opinion will be clear enought to you. > > Have a good day ;) > > -- > José-Luis López > _______________________________________________ > Frugalware-devel mailing list > Frugalware-devel@frugalware.org > http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel >
Vi usually manages to drive me nuts, I really do hate it probably as much as other people love it. I really don't find it simple and intuitive to use either. This is just my personal opinion, I just think it would be good to have an alternative in base. _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list Frugalware-devel@frugalware.org http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
