I don't see that when I read Stefano Zacchiroli's statement [1]. As the subject states "working with FSF on Debian Free-ness assessment"
Key word being we are working Debian's Free-ness. Not the "free-ness" of GNU or GNU documentation. and the ideal goal is: "an agreed upon list of Debian "bugs" that need to be solved, according to the usual Debian mechanisms, and with no special treatment due to their "political" origin." In short this project (as I understand it) is about making debian more free and addressing some of the freedom issues the FSF raises. Not the other way around. We are addressing issues with Debian not with GNU packages/documentation. * [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/07/msg00016.html On 07/08/2012 09:20 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Grant H. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So in short we are talking about how to get Debian to meet the GNU >> projects standards. We are not talking about how to get GNU stuff to >> meet Debian's standards. > > I was under the impression we were talking about both. > -- *Grant H. *Email: [email protected] *Ask me for my GPG key *I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom! _______________________________________________ Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/fsf-collab-discuss
