Well, "public domain" is the anti-thesis of GPL. It is certainly not "free" as the term is used in the GPL. The appropriate translation in most languages for "free" as used in the GPL is "swatantra". As we all know, "swatantrata" does not come "sowjanya".
I feel that the people making the grants have to decide (they have the right to dictate) and, preferably, insist, that the s/w should be released under the GPL. Otherwise, the grants are likely to be appropriated towards non-free uses later on. Please clarify. Frederick Noronha wrote: > Sarai/CSDS, a Delhi-based research network that realises the potential of > Free/Open Source software, is offering a limited number of small grants (in > three categories of under Rs 10,000; Rs 10-30,000; and Rs 30,000-60,000) for > those willing to write socially-useful programmes and put these out in the > public domain. > > Ownership of these programs will remain with its writer(s), under the > GNU/GLP or similar suitable licence. But the coders will undertake to widely > distribute and make available their work to those who desire to use the > same, in the interest of promoting Free Software/Open Source in India. If the intention is ensuring public benefit in the long term, it has to be the GPL. OSD compliance, and OSI certified licenses are, well, compromises. Guess that I can say that with some authority, for I have been watching the Free Vs. OSD debate for some time now. Whether it is the GPL or mere OSD compliance or both, make it clear in the terms of grant, otherwise, there would be problems in the future. Regards, Mahesh T Pai.null nullnull _______________________________________________ Fsf-friends mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mm.gnu.org.in/mailman/listinfo/fsf-friends
