On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:33:41 +0530, Mahesh T Pai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not the case with several licenses approved by the Open Source > Initiative, (OSI), like the BSD and MIT licenses. That is why, BSD > license is non-free. You mean non-copyleft. The Modified BSD license is one of the many non-copyleft GPL compatible free software licenses. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses It gives you all the freedoms that the GPL gives you. But because it is non-copyleft, it also gives you the freedom to deny the same freedoms to others. To call it non-free is non-right :) -- Khuzaima _______________________________________________ Fsf-friends mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mm.gnu.org.in/mailman/listinfo/fsf-friends
