2008/11/18 Arun M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <snip>FSF India was not part of the conference though some board members > participated > in the event. Our participation is no way an endorsement to the conference. > FSF India do have its own stand on the conference. Please note that > this has nothing > to do with what happened. >
Why is it that FSF-I has no public opinion about anything important? Chennai, Kochi, Bangalore... We want to know the reason for FSF-I not being a part of the conference. >From the Vision of FSF-I http://www.gnu.org.in/why-we-exist the only work of FSF-I is to be a not-for-profit company with certain goals which are not mass movement oriented. This is not useful to the Free Software Movement which is a mass movement. Is FSF-I democratic in its constitution? Meaning, are the members elected or do company policies apply? If FSF-I continues in this manner then why do we need any FSF-I? We need an organisation which can guide this Movement and not simply to give verdict/blessings that "this/you is/are right", "that/you is/are wrong",... We want to know how FSF-I intends to proceed in the future. Does it plan to be a participant in the Movement? We want it to be democratic and representative of the Movement in all senses and not simply through talk. -- Vikram Vincent +919448810822 http://swatantra.org/
_______________________________________________ Fsf-friends mailing list [email protected] http://mm.gnu.org.in/mailman/listinfo/fsf-friends
