On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:24 PM, V. Sasi Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 10:29 +0530, haynes davis wrote: > > > These words of Sasikumar are clearly good reasons. Whatever > > 'clarifications' or 'explanations' he has given afterwards are not > > convincing enough. > > > Good reasons for what? Abusing the entire board? Accusing the board of > various things, including harming the FS movement and swindling money? > Of attaining power at the expense of CPM? I don't seem to have any power > other than to look after myself. If you think I do, please give me one > example of where I have used this power. > Good reasons for 'a negative impact on the growth of freedom in India'. Those words are pure disregard for the support cpim has given to free software community. Creating suspicions of these kind will never do good to free software movement. >From FSF-I board staement http://www.gnu.org.in/board-statement-on-recent-issues-1 *"10. Can any one hijack FSF India ? * The structure described above makes that very difficult." What does this mean? Does this mean that some one trying to hijack and they are not successful because of the structure of FSF-I? Do you recognise the work done by cpim as an organisation and a political party for the free software movement? Do you still hold the cpim-hijack theory? If not, why dont you explicitly say you were completely wrong in using those words? Do you think allying with cpim will do good to our movement (considering their present policy on free software)? Should we work with (not for) cpim for the goodness of free software movement? Haynes.
_______________________________________________ Fsf-friends mailing list [email protected] http://mm.gnu.org.in/mailman/listinfo/fsf-friends
