What you say suggests we should have a new petition specifically
against digital handcuffs. And I really mean _against_ them. It
should call for banning digital handcuffs, or at least helping and
encouraging the users to break them.
(General political principle: don't campaign for the status quo,
campaign for a change in the direction we want.)
The petition could say that the proponents of these malfeatures
call them TPMs, but that we won't use their term because we don't
accept its presuppositions.
In order to ensure signatures would be accepted
we would need to go through the process of getting the new text validated
through the Private Members Business Office, just as we did with the
existing petitions.
What's involved in this validation?
Of course, if there isn't time to do this, we must choose some other
path.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/
_______________________________________________
fsfc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfc-discuss
