On 09/06/06, Shane M. Coughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Exclusivity of use and support should perhaps be secondary.

I basically agree, but instead of it being secondary it should be of
primary status, with non-exclusive members allowed but given overtly
secondary status.

IE, Members vs Associates

--
Regards,
Dave


_______________________________________________
Fsfe-uk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk

Reply via email to