On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 02:22 +0100, Tom Chance wrote: > Ahoy, > I think it would be worth picking up the weird allegation about the > size of > RTF files versus DOCs. I always thought it was the reverse - bloaty > DOC files > taking forever to download for a bit of thin formatting! What is this > "one > user's experience"? The whole paragraph comes across as a bit of fluff > written on Slashdot, which is unfortunate because the rest of the > article is > informal but at least more informative. > > A suggested rewrite of the format bit, which is longer but I hope a > bit > clearer. The mention of PDFs is also not necessarily on message ;-)
Thanks Tom, I agree your version is a lot clearer. I've merged that paragraph in but dropped your use of the words "first" and "Secondly" as it conflicted with my use of those counters :) What is the status of PDF as an official open format for documents? I believe it was one of the approved formats. http://beerandspeech.org/fsfe/Letter_to_ICT_Hub_rev2.txt Thanks ~sm
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
