> http://beerandspeech.org/fsfe/bbc-ms-deal/
Comment on second draft, perhaps too late:
I think this paragraph:
Technically the content that Microsoft will deliver
will not be "digital content anytime, anywhere and on
any device" as Bill Gates claims [0]. I would love
that this were true.
is ambiguous and I suggest:
Experience suggests that the content that Microsoft will deliver
technically will not be "digital content anytime, anywhere and on
any device" as Bill Gates claims [0]. I would love that the quote
were true, but it is unlikely to happen if Microsoft's notorious
embrace-and-extend capture is allowed into a BBC partnership.
Small ytpos:
applications that have been licenced by Microsoft for
^^^^^^^^ verb is "licensed"
system you unable to access content on the website.
^^^ missing "will be"?
controlled by a foriegn mega-corporation.
^^ ei ^^ ? to end question
I'd also suggest trying to work in some allusion to the public
value tests and that Microsoft does not work for public value,
but I can't seem to phrase it myself just now.
Hope that helps,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble
_______________________________________________
Fsfe-uk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
