MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If I end up as a user of a medical computer (which > seems likely at some point), then am I no longer deserving of free > software's freedoms as much as possible?
It's not that you're not deserving of them, it's just that physical access is something that the licence probably can't and probably shouldn't try to secure for you. GPlv3 doesn't secure physical access, so that's one way manufacturers can still prevent modification (although this is quite different from tivoisation because the manufacturer also gives up network access). When it is right and wrong for manufacturers to do this is another question. -- Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ http://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3 http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ GPLv3 and other work supported by http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ Fellowship: http://www.fsfe.org _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
