Hi On 27/11/2007, Ciaran O'Riordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Although the FSFE don't consider this the least bit of a problem > > (and appear to have done nothing what-so-ever about it) > > Please don't take this to mean FSFE doesn't consider this a problem. There > are endless problems we could work on and we do our best with the budget and > volunteer time that is provided to us. > > I'm sure there are times when there's an opportunity to contribute a small > effort for a big effect, but we simply don't see it. In that case, one good > way to draw our attention to it is to post an analysis of it to the public > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Another way is to mention it in an > fsfe.org blog post. Maybe we can work on it, or maybe we won't have the > resources. > > If you want FSFE to do more, then you could work on this as a volunteer for > FSFE, or you can help attract donors and encourage people to join the > fellowship (http://fsfe.org) so that FSFE has resources to work on more > projects.
Perhaps FSFE could team up with the OpenSourceConsortium on this issue? http://opensourceconsortium.org/ I'm an FSFE member. This would be one issue I would prefer FSFE to support over other other issues. Why not have a vote of members on what issues we'd like to be the focus for the next 6 months? Kind regards, Jon -- linkme: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jongrant weblog: http://jguk.org/ _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
