"Jon Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13/01/2008, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > directly in those cases. (But remember that Firefox isn't 100% free > > software, which is why at least one of the Iceweasels exists.) > > RMS+Eben weren't interested in fixing up GPLv3 to prevent trademark > issues (like Firefox, CentOS needing to de-brand RedHat etc). So may > not really a Free Software issue in light of them not acknowledging it > as such, or only in some people's opinions at least. [...]
Can you link to that lack of interest? The gplv3 drafting search still doesn't work for me. I don't think trademark licensing should be included in the copyright licence, but then I don't think patent licensing should either and that's in GPLv3. Regards, -- MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+44-844-4437-237 - Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, consumer and workers co-operative member http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ - Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
