"Jon Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We wouldn't have had had a browser if it wasn't for that book

Frank Hecker says Eric Hahn was the person most responable for Netscape
freeing their browser:
http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/ec1May.html

Of the CatB paper, he says:

 "In my opinion the paper's importance in the context of Netscape's decision
  was mainly that it provided some independent validation of ideas that were
  already being actively discussed and promoted within Netscape."

A decision maker from Netscape (possibly Hecker), also made similar comments
in the Revolution OS documentary, along the lines that CatB was a factor,
but by no means the main factor.

-- 
CiarĂ¡n O'Riordan __________________ \ Support Free Software and GNU/Linux
http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \     Join FSFE's Fellowship:
http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \      http://www.fsfe.org


_______________________________________________
Fsfe-uk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk

Reply via email to