Let me make my position clear, I have always seen matters where others in groupings such as unincorporated associations handle the monies and assets of the association as being fraught with risk from, incompetence, lack of due diligence, ignorance, and yes a certain amount of temptation. Which is why there is legislation covering things such as separate and several liability. Let everyone be quite clear, the management of the AFFS since the 2004 AGM, has been of less than an acceptable standard. To just step away from such a failure, re-erect a similar structure, and to not put in place safeguards to prevent its re-occurrence, would be foolish at the very least.
This list, which itself was originally put in place to act as the communication conduit for the AFFS, should at the very least uncover why the AFFS ended up in the position it did, who took the decision to return the subscriptions, and their reasons for doing so. Not to do so is to invite the same thing to happen again. -- John Seago GNU/Linux Registered User No. #219566 http://counter.li.org/ _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
