On 07/30/2010 11:18 AM, [email protected] wrote:
I don't think that the article deserved the response that it got.
It is a woefully ignorant article. Its contents deserves criticism, and the BCS deserve criticism for publishing it.
Also this really wont encourage the BCS to publish other documents,
If the other documents are as bad as this one, that's a *good* thing.
and if they cant publish articles that are critical of Free Software, then their journalism serves little purpose and is unlikely to attract a much wider audience than it already has.
Why should criticising Free Software be part of the BCS's mission? And if it is, why should they not do so with at least a modicum of intelligence and understanding rather than simply spreading tendentious misinformation?
- Rob. _______________________________________________ Fsfe-uk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk
