On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Truong Anh. Tuan <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Buddhike Kurera" <[email protected]> >> To: "FUDCon/FAD planning group" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 1:30:00 AM >> Subject: Re: Funding Approval Meeting for FUDCon Kuala Lumpur 2012 >> >> I am not speaking on behalf the organizing team. >> However I am not aware on how the evaluation will be carried out. >> inode0 has raised an important issue as I see, if the requests are >> not evaluated as first come, first serve (FC, FS) basis. >> >> I understood that the evaluation should be carried out as per the >> guideline[1] and I agree with that rather than entertaining the >> request on FC, FS basis. >> >> Thanks inode0 again for raising this. >> >> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sponsoring_event_attendees#Criteria > > IMHO, I think, it's not good to evaluate as FC-FS basis. We should > sponsor to people who can contribute most to the event while keep > the total in budget.
purely fcfs is bad, I agree .. > > For the Funding approval meeting today, as we have got a specific > appointment, I think it still could be happened while it has not got > any conflicts with above statement. > In that meeting, we can have fund approved for nearly-sure requests > (for people we see mostly closed to the criteria) Yes, I am planning to follow the usual criteria , but with advantage to early submission, (not first-come-first-serve, just early, ie: before tonight's meeting) .. due to the short timeframe we have .. -- Mohd Izhar Firdaus Bin Ismail / KageSenshi Inigo Consulting (FOSS/Plone Development, Training & Services) http://www.inigo-tech.com Fedora Malaysia Contributor & Ambassador http://blog.kagesenshi.org 92C2 B295 B40B B3DC 6866 5011 5BD2 584A 8A5D 7331 _______________________________________________ fudcon-planning mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fudcon-planning
