Folks, thank you. We've used Tatyana recipe, it bypasses http proxy by replacing endpoint IP address.
Thanks a lot. 2013/10/30 Mike Scherbakov <[email protected]> > Roman - we can ask OpenStack community team for implementing required > pieces into the client. Find me if you think we need this. > > Thanks, > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Tatyana Leontovich < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> You has several path to fix this problem: >> 1 - Develop own light-weight client, that wiil be based on urllib3 or >> requests and only request (get / post/ delete) on those uri that you want >> to tests >> 2 - When you try to initialize client - do not request endpoint from >> keystone, just do it by next way: >> auth_url = self.config.identity.uri >> tenant_name = self.config.identity.admin_tenant_name >> ceilometer_url = self.config.ceilometer.api_url >> if not username: >> username = self.config.identity.admin_username >> if not password: >> password = self.config.identity.admin_password >> return ceilometer.api.client.Client(username=username, >> api_key=password, >> endpoint=ceilometer_uri >> .... (all needed for client initialization)) >> >> where self.config.ceilometer.api_url will be defined in config.py >> base_ip = public_vip or self.compute.controller_nodes[0] >> endpoint = 'http://{0}:{1}/{2}'.format( >> base_ip, port_here, 'version_here') >> >> (you can use initialization of heatclient and muranoclient as example. >> This clients do not works trough proxy too. All needed things are placed in >> config.py and nmanager.py) >> >> And I agreed with Vladimir - as for copy -paste >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Vladimir Kuklin >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Roman, I think the easiest way is to patch corresponding libraries to >>> support http proxy. Looks like this should be only the matter of copy-paste >>> of code. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Roman Sokolkov <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, folks. >>>> >>>> Fuel uses http proxy on controller (i.e. 10.20.0.3:8888) to give >>>> access for OSTF tests inside OpenStack networks. We've plunged in to >>>> troubles w/ python-ceilometerclient. It is not support http_proxy, because >>>> it based on httplib module that not support proxy from environment >>>> variables. >>>> >>>> [root@fuel ~]# http_proxy=http://10.20.0.3:8888 ceilometer >>>> --os-username=admin --os-password=admin >>>> --os-tenant-id=6fc07efb143b4aada4052c1ec0154545 --os-auth-url= >>>> http://10.20.0.3:5000/v2.0 meter-list >>>> Error communicating with http://172.16.0.2:8777 [Errno 113] No route >>>> to host >>>> >>>> but novaclient works like a charm >>>> >>>> [root@fuel ~]# http_proxy=http://10.20.0.3:8888 nova >>>> --os-username=admin --os-password=admin >>>> --os-tenant-id=6fc07efb143b4aada4052c1ec0154545 --os-auth-url= >>>> http://10.20.0.3:5000/v2.0 list >>>> >>>> +--------------------------------------+-------+--------+------------+-------------+----------------------+ >>>> | ID | Name | Status | Task State | >>>> Power State | Networks | >>>> >>>> +--------------------------------------+-------+--------+------------+-------------+----------------------+ >>>> | 358da20a-e8ae-4d2a-afce-9ff866f6267a | new01 | ACTIVE | None | >>>> Running | novanetwork=10.0.0.2 | >>>> | 0e65a7cb-bed7-403b-9043-feadfb5f2149 | new02 | ACTIVE | None | >>>> Running | novanetwork=10.0.0.4 | >>>> | 831a198b-daea-4b85-a6ec-cce85861fcb2 | new03 | ACTIVE | None | >>>> Running | novanetwork=10.0.0.5 | >>>> | 13adf693-539f-40b9-bc87-af16ed45a016 | new04 | ACTIVE | None | >>>> Running | novanetwork=10.0.0.6 | >>>> | e8c46558-6f0c-4453-9a42-0c0e1df760c9 | new05 | ACTIVE | None | >>>> Running | novanetwork=10.0.0.7 | >>>> | ea443306-d2df-4fc2-9286-df74d4a48eb4 | new06 | ACTIVE | None | >>>> Running | novanetwork=10.0.0.8 | >>>> >>>> +--------------------------------------+-------+--------+------------+-------------+----------------------+ >>>> >>>> Also i've found that glanceclient also based on httplib and not works >>>> w/ http_proxy. In OSTF for image tests used novaclient, not glanceclient. >>>> >>>> My question is... Is there any routing, iptables way(without proxy) to >>>> provide access from master node to openstack networks? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, Roman Sokolkov >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >>>> Post to : [email protected] >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Yours Faithfully, >>> Vladimir Kuklin, >>> Senior Deployment Engineer, >>> Mirantis, Inc. >>> +7 (495) 640-49-04 >>> +7 (926) 702-39-68 >>> Skype kuklinvv >>> 45bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str. >>> Moscow, Russia, >>> www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/> >>> www.mirantis.ru >>> [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> >>> -- >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > > -- > Mike Scherbakov > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- Regards, Roman Sokolkov
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
