Folks, I'm wondering on the status of this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1261966, which basically affects our rados-gw support story. Looks like it has pretty decent comments and it is still Incomplete for some reason. Let's review it again - what would be our action items in getting rados-gw for glance?
Thanks, On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Andrew Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:57 AM, David Easter <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> >> If we install Swift by default for customer object storage, and it's not >> very common for customers to choose ceph rados-gw, perhaps we can continue >> to leave that out of the Wizard for now and keep it in Settings. >> > > We only left swift installing for object because rados-gw support barely > made it into 3.2, If https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1261966 is > resolved, we probably should make rados-gw default if ceph is chosen for > glance > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
