Ok, guys, let's start a blueprint for this feature. There should be some information on the current state of the art. AFAIK there is no testing result on parallel controller deployment.
Andrew, did you try to implement this feature? Did you test parallel deployment of the controllers? Did it fail or did it succeed? As for me speaking for parallel deployment reminds us of our pluggable architecture that should allow us to run some roles in parallels. I am not quite sure that we have an opportunity to spend resources on such tasks right now. On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Sergey Vasilenko <[email protected]>wrote: > For decrease count of possible HA-issues in the parallel deployment mode > we should: > * create any Pacemaker resources only at primary controller deployment > process > * move Galera deployment to the its ows stage (for prevent parallel galera > deployment) > * OR rewrite galera ocf script, for syncing slave nodes with master as > node-by-node (not all together) > > > /sv > > -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin, Fuel Library Tech Lead, Mirantis, Inc. +7 (495) 640-49-04 +7 (926) 702-39-68 Skype kuklinvv 45bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str. Moscow, Russia, www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/> www.mirantis.ru [email protected]
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
