Yes, I'm planning to have this in the 5.0 docs -- I'll be adding more articles over the next week so we don't have embarrassing omissions... I think it has enough content to be useful in 5.0, and it will get better in 5.1, and better yet in 6.0...
meg On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Mike Scherbakov <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Meg, > do we plan to land it in 5.0? > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Meg McRoberts <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> A first draft of the Terminology Reference is available for review: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88662/ >> >> The blueprint is here: >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/term-reference-doc >> >> I will be adding a lot more content -- you will notice that the current >> doc has some terms that might be considered low priority while >> excluding terms that are quite important -- I expect to fix this very >> soon, in the context of restructuring the doc set. >> >> Meanwhile, I welcome comments and suggestions, and feel free to >> add additional articles or send me source for articles you would like >> to see. >> >> meg >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > > -- > Mike Scherbakov > #mihgen >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
