Last time I saw Pecan it didn't have JSON support at all, only text/plain and html. That's kinda strange for REST framework.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Andrey Danin <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the status of Pecan? Does it mature and used broadly in OpenStack > community? Or it's buggy like Oslo.messaging? > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Nikolay Markov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello colleagues! >> >> As you may know, we really want to get rid of old web.py and go towards >> something new, especially because for now it's not really hard to rewrite >> our API as it became more abstract. Also, in Fuel 6.0 there will be >> multiple important changes in our API, so we definitely need to implement >> v2, and doing it using modern framework looks like a good start. >> >> I did some research on both Pecan and Flask, also we had a discussion on >> this subject with our Fuel-Python team yesterday, and looks like we're >> choosing Flask over Pecan, because there are almost no bad things anybody >> could say about it. >> >> What are your thoughts? I know there is a pull request on Pecan already, >> but my personal opinion is it doens't worth all this headache. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Nick Markov >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > > -- > Andrey Danin > [email protected] > skype: gcon.monolake > -- Best regards, Nick Markov
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
