Ceph Replication can be heavy at times and may impact other types of traffic. So if possible it's better to keep Storage net on separate NIC
On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Roman Rufanov <[email protected]> wrote: > Does that means that we should never out Storage on separate physical > network since it will be idle most of the time except when doing > replication? > Roman > > > > Roman Rufanov > Technical Project Manager > Phone: 414-736-0066 > Skype: RRufanov > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Aleksandr Didenko <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> yes, this is how it works currently (I'm looking at 5.1 cluster with ceph >> right now). >> >> Regards, >> Alex >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Dmitriy Novakovskiy < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Question from one of the customers - in Fuel 5.x, are we still using >>> Storage net for replication of Ceph/Swift only, and traffic between VM and >>> RBD volume is going through Management net? >>> >>> --- >>> Regards, >>> >>> *Dmitriy Novakovskiy* >>> Sales Engineer, Mirantis EMEA >>> >>> *Skype:* dmitriy.novakovskiy >>> *Operating from:* Ukraine >>> >>> -- >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >> > -- --- Regards, *Dmitriy Novakovskiy* Sales Engineer, Mirantis EMEA *Skype:* dmitriy.novakovskiy *Operating from:* Ukraine
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
