I agree, we all know that the voting machines had problems (cell phones have problems, cars have problems). Maybe Bush's cell phone had something to do with all of this? That doesn't make sense does it? Cellphones are political, but every time we talk about voting exploits, names are thrown in and everyone get all off track. This issue has been hashed out on this list before, must we re work it again? Just search the archives if you weren't around for the first run around.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Humphries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 6:26 PM > To: Todd Towles > Cc: mike lieman; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] US pres election was hacked > away byDumbya&cabal. > > > On Mar 10, 2005, at 12:45 PM, Todd Towles wrote: > > > You post a article which you knew would start a political > debate. If > > you want to talk about the security of electronic voting, then what > > can people people against you? But you aren't being general. > > Now an article describing or a demonstration of an exploit, > on, say, a Diebold voting appliance would had been on topic. > > Not to mention that it'd increase voter registration because > everyone would be keen to try it. :) > > -- whump > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
